Decisions

Commercial Litigation & Contract Disputes

Family Law

Hooker v. Hooker, 220 So. 3d 397 (Fla. 2017): Resolving an express and direct conflict regarding the standard of review for determining whether spouses made a gift of non-marital property during the marriage.

Austin v. Echemendia, 198 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016): Reversing an order denying a petition for injunction for protection against repeat violence.

Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch, 174 So. 3d 983 (Fla. 2015): Resolving a certified conflict and certified question of great public importance by holding that the wife, in the prenuptial agreement, waived her right to share in any asset titled in the husband’s name that was acquired or enhanced during the marriage.

Hallac v. Hallac, 88 So. 3d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012): Affirming, in part, an award of reduced attorney’s fees in a divorce case where the wife failed to accept a favorable settlement.

Brown v. Brown, 989 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008): Reversing a final judgment of dissolution of marriage because the trial court’s valuation of stock in a marital company was unsupported by the evidence.

Von Baillou v. Von Baillou, 959 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007): Reversing an order requiring the former husband to pay all of the former wife’s attorney’s fees, accountant’s fees and litigation costs in a dissolution of marriage case.

Thompson v. Thompson, 576 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1991): Answering a certified question of great public importance and holding that the value of a professional association’s goodwill that accumulated during the marriage is a marital asset under certain circumstances.

Criminal Law

Wight v. State, 117 So. 3d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013): Reversing the defendant’s conviction for conspiracy to commit unlawful compensation or reward for official behavior.

Brown v. State, 428 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1983): Answering a certified question of great public importance in a case involving constructive possession of contraband in a jointly occupied premises.

This list includes some of the published decisions in noteworthy cases Kreusler-Walsh Vargas & Serafin, P.A., has handled in the past. This list does not include all of our past cases and is not necessarily representative of the results our firm has obtained in past cases. The facts and circumstances in your case may be different than in these cases. You should not read these past results as providing an example of what will happen in your case.

Contact

Kreusler-Walsh Vargas & Serafin

CONTACT US

VISIT US

501 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 503
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

FOLLOW US

Contact

Kreusler-Walsh Vargas & Serafin

CONTACT US

VISIT US

501 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 503
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

FOLLOW US